James Cammarata wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 13:49:46 -0500, Michael DeHaan <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>   
>> Rodrique Heron wrote:
>>     
>>> I don't believe this might just be a bad i386 iso, because I was able 
>>> to import the x86_64 hardy and intrepid without issue. But I am 
>>> posting it because I would like to understand what the error message 
>>> means.
>>>
>>> I don't believe I am affected by the "omapi_enabled: 0" setting, since 
>>> I have it off.
>>>       
>> Yes, this is an unrelated traceback.   Can you post the full command you 
>> fed to cobbler import so we can try it?  (Also, where di the ISO come
>> from?)
>>     
>
> Not sure if that's required.  The issue seems to be here (in class
> UbuntuImporter):
>   

Yes, it's required, he needs to post the line he fed to cobbler import 
so I can repro it, and also provide a link to the ISO used.

Reproduction steps are always required :)

>        dist_vers = "%s.%s" % ( major , minor )
>        if not dist_names.has_key( dist_vers ):
>            dist_names['4ubuntu2.0'] = "IntrepidIbex"
>        os_version = dist_names[dist_vers]  <= line 1159
>
>
> So it looks (based on the traceback) like the dist_vers is '1ubuntu5.0'. 
> This is probably a brand new release/spin that is not getting caught by the
> if statement above the line that fails.
>
>   

Yes, that was my thought as well.

> This looks like it needs a better method for catching new versions.
>
>
>   
I agree.



_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler

Reply via email to