Hi Earlier in the thread I promised to send a link for the cobbler code I wrote... so here it is.
https://github.com/gjngeldenhuis/stuff please ignore the very imaginative git repository name... :D It should be lightly documented. Regards On 31 January 2012 16:46, Michael DeHaan <[email protected]> wrote: > My view is basically that you have three entities: > > OS setup -> Config Setup -> Monitoring > > The thing that owns OS setup also owns the way that control is transferred > to the next, similar to the way that many configuration tools can also help > you set up monitoring. They don't own monitoring, but they own the setup > of the next tool in the chain > > ( cobbler: OS setup -> ) (config tool: Config Setup -> ) Monitoring > > Each tool owns the arrow that sets up the next. > > But to do the thing with each tool, you go to tweak the tool that can best > tweak itself, rather than working through a little tiny porthole and making > it harder. > > Bad analogy -- suppose you have a car. You can either drive the car or > you can tell someone else how to drive the car, but it will never be as > immediate as driving the actual car. My first analogy would have been > with analog synthesizer knobs vs MIDI commands in a Digital Audio > Workstation but that might not work for everyone :) > > > -- Gerhardus Geldenhuis
_______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
