Not much new to say, but I just need to vent. I bought the new Sibley at the 
Boulder Bookstore this afternoon. When I got home, I compared it to my old 
Sibley. The new book's bird colors are substantially darker, richer colored, on 
many plates. In my view, quite unacceptable. To make things worse, they must 
have used so much ink on the plates that they didn't have enough left over for 
the printed words (just kidding). The printed words are faintly inked compared 
to the old Sibley. I see the book was printed in China. Maybe if they'd printed 
it in the U.S. it might have been convenient to proof the book before countless 
unacceptable copies were printed. I returned my book to the Boulder Bookstore 
for credit this evening. I'm disappointed and inconvenienced. If I were David 
Sibley, I would be outraged. I have a ticket to his book signing in Boulder. 
I'll be interested to hear what he has to say about this. 
David Waltman 
Boulder 

----- Original Message -----
From: "Barry" <[email protected]> 
To: [email protected] 
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2014 2:06:09 PM 
Subject: Re: [cobirds] Re: New Sibley Guide: Wait for the next printing 


Sharon Stiteler (Birdchick) posted some pictures comparing the colors to 
previous editions on her blog: 
http://www.birdchick.com/wp/2014/03/so-i-got-a-second-edition-sibley/ 


She notes that the Scarlet Tanager is much darker (and too dark) in this 
edition, and that reds & oranges are in general a bit off. She uses 
Red-Shouldered Hawk as another example, where the bars look more brown than the 
orange she expected. 



Here's what David Sibley himself said in a comment on his website: 





David Sibley March 16, 2014 at 11:46 AM 




Yes, there are some problems with the colors in the second edition and those 
will be corrected in the next printing. 





See The Second edition is in-hand at sibleyguides.com 


The printing issue apparently only affects a certain number of plates, or maybe 
it's just worse on some than others. Complaints I've seen have been about the 
reds being too dark and lack of detail on some images. The other major 
complaint is about the font being difficult to read, which is supposed to be 
corrected in the next printing as well. 


I haven't seen the book yet myself. I suggest you judge for yourself, but if 
Sibley is saying the colors are off on a few paintings, I'd believe him. Most 
of the paintings are supposed to be fine. He's going to be at the Tattered 
Cover on April 3 and the Boulder Bookstore on April 4, but I'm sure he's tired 
of answering questions about this. :-) 

-- 
- Barry Gingrich 
Broomfield County 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group. 
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] . 
To post to this group, send email to [email protected] . 
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/a746329d-6049-4892-8b29-ff18190bc5fe%40googlegroups.com
 . 
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout . 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/1033414433.619780.1395457828771.JavaMail.root%40sz0040a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to