This photo looks OK for Hermit Thrush. Thrushes can be tough, considering 
their similar plumage and tendencies to stay hidden in the shadowy 
thickets.  Keep in mind we also can potentially have migrants of unusual 
subspecies - dark Veery, russet-backed Swainson's, etc., which could make 
things more challenging.  We used to get hundreds of Swainson's Thrushes in 
spring and fall migration back in NCTX, with Gray-cheeked being outnumbered 
probably 50:1 or 100:1.      Gray-cheeked, after seeing enough, become 
pretty distinctive in the different appearance of the face.  Gray-cheeked 
typically doesn't really have an "eye-ring" per se, but more of a lack of 
eyering.   Let me put it this way, a lack of pale orbital ring in the 
frontal half, and a semblance of an eyering on the rear half, being 
pronounced as a pale 'teardrop' behind the eye - think Cordilleran/PacSlope 
Flycatcher, but less pronounced.        Hermit Thrush seems to be somewhat 
in between Swainson's (usually buffy complete eyering) and Gray-cheeked 
(incomplete, teardrop to the rear) with Hermit being a simple eyering, like 
in this photo. Oft times Hermit would throw a wrench in the gears because 
of it's 'middle of the road' facial pattern - but time-of-year, and of 
course a view of the rusty tail would typically solve that.  Now Bicknell's 
Thrush.... good luck with that one.
Derek Hill
Milliken

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Colorado Birds" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/cobirds/91290032-2ce5-4e95-97fb-2b7b223fa0c0%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to