> > Finally, I'd like to ask how you collect the correct cc: for each patch. Is > > this handwork, get_maintainers.pl or something else? > > get_maintainers. It's irrelevant to Coccinelle, but I use the option > --git-min-signatures 50000 to only sent the patch to the maintainers, not > to the recent contributers for the given files.
I use --no-git for that purpose now; this makes it a little faster, too.
I was yet able to use -patch correctly and the patches look pretty good.
There is one issue left, however. If I want to make patches per directory,
then I'd need spatch to _not_ recurse into child directories. Given
drivers/misc
drivers/misc/eeprom
the patch for 'drivers/misc/' will now also contain the eeprom-patches.
While I'm still thinking if one or two patches are more apropriate for my
current case, I think being able to control recursion is useful in general.
What do you think?
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
