On Mon, 1 Mar 2010, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Finally, I'd like to ask how you collect the correct cc: for each patch. > > > Is > > > this handwork, get_maintainers.pl or something else? > > > > get_maintainers. It's irrelevant to Coccinelle, but I use the option > > --git-min-signatures 50000 to only sent the patch to the maintainers, not > > to the recent contributers for the given files. > > I use --no-git for that purpose now; this makes it a little faster, too. > > I was yet able to use -patch correctly and the patches look pretty good. > There is one issue left, however. If I want to make patches per directory, > then I'd need spatch to _not_ recurse into child directories. Given > > drivers/misc > drivers/misc/eeprom > > the patch for 'drivers/misc/' will now also contain the eeprom-patches. > While I'm still thinking if one or two patches are more apropriate for my > current case, I think being able to control recursion is useful in general. > What do you think?
If you don't want recursion, perhaps it is easier to just iterate over the desired files at the shell level? I could make yet another option for this behavior, but Coccinelle already has a lot of them... julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci (Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
