On Sunday 07 March 2010 04:33:46 Wolfram Sang wrote:
> ACK. The possibility to add comments is also nice. There, I accidently found a
> bug or at least, the syntax is not what I expected. I had this excerpt in my
> spatch-file:
>
> + /*
> * This is
> * a kernel style multi comment
> */
>
> Note the missing '+' for lines 2-4. Still, the patch contained all of the
> comment:
>
> + /*
> + * This is
> + * a kernel style multi comment
> + */
>
> Come to think of it, comments are probably not existant in the abstract layer,
> so there wouldn't be anything to match against without '+'. Dunno if this
> should be an error. A warning maybe ("Did you mean '+ <string>'")?
>
I think this is an unknown feature ! ;)
Should we keep it Julia ?
--
Nicolas Palix
Tel: (+33) 1 44 27 87 25
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
