@is_member_function@
identifier f, s;
type t;
@@
struct s
{
...
t (*f)(...);
...
}
I have tried out the SmPL construct "nest" a few times.
http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/docs/main_grammar004.html
Now I wonder why it does not work as expected with the following variant of a
filter pattern.
@is_member_function@
identifier f, s;
type t;
position p;
@@
struct s
{
<+...
t@p (*f)(...);
...+>
}
elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Coccinelle/lokal/demos/return_values> spatch -sp_file
select_non_void_functions3.cocci example1b.c
init_defs_builtins: /usr/share/coccinelle/standard.h
679 684
Fatal error: exception Failure("minus: parse error:
= File "select_non_void_functions3.cocci", line 30, column 2, charpos = 679
around = '<+...', whole content = <+...
")
How do you think about information from an article like "Tag vs. Type Names" by
Dan Saks?
http://eetimes.com/discussion/programming-pointers/4024450/Tag-vs-Type-Names
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)
