On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
<+... ...+> is not suuported in structure declarations. You should have the
same
effect with plain ...
Thanks for your quick explanation. :-)
I have assumed that I should use the plus character together with the SmPL
ellipsis so that a specific pattern should be matched at least.
Will this SmPL construct become supported in structure declarations?
I don't think it is necessary, It is the same as ... in this case.
Perhaps it could be useful for fields of nestde structures...
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.diku.dk/mailman/listinfo/cocci
(Web access from inside DIKUs LAN only)