On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Eitan Adler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 22 October 2012 13:05, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: >> My understanding is that the output of a semantic patch should not be GPL. >> But I am not an expert. In any case, that is the intent. We would >> certainly be happy that the scripts be part of BSD. > > Awesome. Hopefully I will be able to start gathering a set of useful > scripts soon.
So... We should talk a bit more :) Also I'd love to help iron out any FUD over licensing issues given that it seems the intent expressed is not to enforce requirement of output being GPL derivative. Luis _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
