On 23 October 2012 15:18, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote: > I wonder if for BSD you are actually interested in using the rules that do > transformation?
Yes. This was the subject of mail. Ideally they could be 2-BSD licensed (or dual-licensed) which solves the problem entirely. If not, I'd be willing to accept assertions of the authors that they do not intend for the output of the transformations to be considered GPL. > Most of the rules that are distributed with Linux can be > used in several ways, to do transformation or to print a report. For the > ones that only print reports, I guess there is no problem at all, because no > code is generated? > I'm not sure what would be the status of the rules that > can do transformation if you only use them to generate reports. As I understand it, there is no problem at all for reports as the code is not being directly used (it is similar to a warning from gcc). -- Eitan Adler _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
