> Maybe it would be more efficient.  But conceptually it is redundant.

Thanks for your feedback.

I would find it a bit clearer or safer to use a SmPL variable like "r.i" only if
a corresponding dependency was specified on the rule beginning.

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Reply via email to