> On the other hand, the dependency is not always necessary, for example in > the following case: > > @@ > expression r.e; > @@
It seems that you designed the semantic patch language in the way that a dependency will implicitly created because of a SmPL variable like "r.e". I wonder if it would help eventually to mention such dependencies explicitly between the "@" characters. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
