> nit.cocci: > @@ > expression list L; > @@ > - f(L); > + g(L);
Would it make sense and work to write a semantic patch rule like the following? @replacement@ @@ -f +g (L); Can the passed parameters be omitted from the desired adjustment by "the plus line"? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
