On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> > nit.cocci: > > @@ > > expression list L; > > @@ > > - f(L); > > + g(L); > > Would it make sense and work to write a semantic patch rule like the > following? > > @replacement@ > @@ > -f > +g > (L); > > > Can the passed parameters be omitted from the desired adjustment by "the plus > line"? For the particular example, this would be better, but presumably the real case is more complex. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
