>> Does the metavariable type "expression" match also to the empty string? > > No.
Thanks for your clarification. I hope then that the shown specification of the SmPL variable will be sufficient for a while to search for function implementations with a non-void return type. >> How are the chances that more documentation will become available >> for safe processing of corresponding abstract syntax graph instances? > > About the same as the chance that a user who wants the documentation will > write it. I have no plans to do so. In general, if you know enough OCaml > to use the abstract syntax tree, you also know enough OCaml to figure out > what it is from the source code. Everything is defined in > parsing_c/ast_c.ml. I would find it nice if a data structure representation will evolve which is more independent from specific programming languages. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
