>> How are the chances that more documentation will become available >> for safe processing of corresponding abstract syntax graph instances? > > About the same as the chance that a user who wants the documentation will > write it. I have no plans to do so. In general, if you know enough OCaml > to use the abstract syntax tree, you also know enough OCaml to figure out > what it is from the source code. Everything is defined in > parsing_c/ast_c.ml.
Does this "tree" data structure correspond to the complete input from the source file? I imagine that a special mapping for expression data should be sufficient for the discussed SmPL metavariable, shouldn' it? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
