> +@r depends on context || org || report@
> +position p;
> +typedef u8, u16, u32, u64;
Can the involved data types be restricted for unsigned types for such
a source code analysis in a more general way?
> +{unsigned char, unsigned short int, unsigned int, unsigned long, unsigned
> long long, size_t, u8, u16, u32, u64} v;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +*v@p < 0
> +|
> +*v@p >= 0
> +)
How do you think about to use the following SmPL wording instead?
v@p
(
*< 0
|
*<= 0
)
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
