>> v@p >> ( >> *< 0 >> | >> *<= 0 >> ) > > It does not, and is not intended to, work. The branches of a disjunction > should be complete expressions.
Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then? ( *v@p < 0 | *v@p <= 0 ) Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
