On Oct 10 2016, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
>
>> On Oct 08 2016, Julia Lawall <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> > Write separate rules for that. You would need one case for a local
>> >> > variable and one case fora parameter. You can actually probably just
>> >> > drop
>> >> > the rule you have currently. I would imagine something like the
>> >> > following:
>> >> >
>> >> > @@
>> >> > symbol f, se; // avoid unneeded warnings from Coccinelle
>> >> > @@
>> >> >
>> >> > struct fuse_session *
>> >> > -f
>> >> > +se
>> >> > ;
>> >> > <...
>> >> > -f
>> >> > +se
>> >> > ...>
>> >> > @@
>> >> > identifier fn;
>> >> > @@
>> >> >
>> >> > fn(...,struct fuse_session *f,...) { <...
>
> Oops, the first line should be:
>
> fn(...,struct fuse_session *
> -f
> +se
> ,...) { <...
>
> The rule works fine even when f is the first argument.
Ouch, I guess I could have caught that too. Works like a charm now!
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
