On Tue, 15 Nov 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> * Can SmPL rules be constructed from smaller parts by it? > > > > I don't understand what it would mean for syntax to or not to matter. > > I am curious if the included data need to be usable also alone in the > SmPL sense. I think that if you have multiple includes, later includes can refer to rules in earlier includes. julia _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
