> I don't understand what it would mean for syntax to or not to matter. I am checking if the mentioned SmPL statement could be used just for the inclusion of a bit of code for a metavariable constraint within a script template.
> The main issue seems to be that the includes can only appear before the normal > SmPL rules. I guess that this information means that I need to concatenate pieces by tools which are external to the semantic patch language in my use case. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
