>> @rule1@ >> expression x; >> expression list y; >> @@ >> -DBG_PRINTF >> +NV_PRINTF >> ( >> - (x), >> y); > > This doesn't work:
Do you care if a macro (or function) parameter is optionally enclosed by parentheses? > - DBG_PRINTF((DBG_MODULE_OS, DEBUGLEVEL_ERRORS, > - "NVRM: x86emu: int $%d (eax = %08x)\n", num, M.x86.R_EAX)); > + NV_PRINTF(); Does this test result need any further clarification for the desired software behaviour on an other change granularity? > I always appreciate optimization suggestions. I have got another software development idea for this transformation approach. How do you think about to improve the replacement specification a bit more by combining the variants A till D into a single SmPL rule which will use a nested SmPL disjunction? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
