>> Will the support for unary operations need any further development >> considerations? > > No, the precedence should be ok as is.
I got another idea. The semantic patch language supports the metavariable type “binary operator”. https://github.com/coccinelle/coccinelle/blob/b4509f6e7fb06d5616bb19dd5a110b203fd0e566/docs/manual/cocci_syntax.tex#L266 How do you think about to add the construct “unary operator”? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
