>> To force the <+... ...+> to be parsed as an expression, you have to surround
>> it with ().
I was unused to this technical detail.
Will such information become more helpful also for a better software
documentation?
I adjusted my evolving search pattern a bit more.
I looked at the output from the command “spatch --parse-cocci …” again.
I find a display like the following questionable then.
“…
)) eselse {
... WHEN any WHEN != x = y;
…”
Would another delimiter be better in the output like “)) es else {” here?
Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
