On Fri, 22 Nov 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > T *ptr for example.
>
> 1. Does this information for a “type constraint” distract from my questions?
>
> 2. Can the data type become restricted not only by the detail
> that it refers to a pointer?
You can put any type, such as int x;. You can also put parts of types
such as expression * x; or struct x;
>
> 3. Why should such a SmPL specification matter for the handling of
> expressions?
Only expressions have types.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
