On Thu, 16 Apr 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Would I need any extra parameters here?
> >
> > Perhaps -I options to help it find the relevant .h file.
>
> I wonder why the relevant header files would not be found directly
> from the corresponding Git repository.
OK, it seems that the structure is defined in the same file so no include
options should be needed. But I have now lost track of what the
semantic patch actually is, so I don't know what is the problem.
julia
>
> Can a file inclusion failure become an immediate SmPL script execution error
> when a special program parameter would be passed?
>
>
> Can it be that the pointer variable “priv” to the data structure
> “rcar_i2c_priv”
> distracts from the desired understanding of a questionable software situation
> when the relevant declaration is provided in the same source file?
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc1/source/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c#L119
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-rcar.c?id=8632e9b5645bbc2331d21d892b0d6961c1a08429#n119
>
> Regards,
> Markus
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
