>> * How many software implementations use identical type definitions >> and function-like macros? > > I don't know.
Can it become interesting to find more about such usage patterns out? > For what it's worth, it's valid C. Unless I'm mistaken, > Coccinelle tries to support as much of C as it possibly can. How do you think about limitations for corresponding software development resources? > The QEMU project can certainly work around this Coccinelle > bug / restriction. Which adjustments will be chosen? >> * How will the evolution be continued around Coccinelle? > > Is this a question about Coccinelle's future? Yes, of course. Are we trying to influence further development anyhow? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
