Markus Elfring <markus.elfr...@web.de> writes: >>>> * spatch seems to have trouble parsing >>>> >>>> ARMSSE *s = ARMSSE(opaque); >>>> >>>> where ARMSSE is a typedef, and ARMSSE() is a function-like macro. >>>> Yes, I know that's in rather poor taste. >>> >>> I am curious for the safe handling of related software development >>> challenges. >>> >>> >>>> * Workaround #1: rename the typedef to ARMSSE_ >>> >>> Will adjustments become more interesting also around such name space issues? >> >> I'm not sure I understand your question. Can you elaborate? > > Do we come along the need to adjust (or even improve) two software areas? > > * How many software implementations use identical type definitions > and function-like macros?
I don't know. For what it's worth, it's valid C. Unless I'm mistaken, Coccinelle tries to support as much of C as it possibly can. The QEMU project can certainly work around this Coccinelle bug / restriction. I'm reporting it because I've found Coccinelle useful. > * How will the evolution be continued around Coccinelle? Is this a question about Coccinelle's future? _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
