>> Can the semantic patch language help to insist for a search that a bit >> of source code belongs to the implementation of a function-like macro? > > That's what the search that was written does. The pattern that comes > after #define has to be in the definition of the macro.
I suggest to consider additional source code variants. With which SmPL constructs should be ensured that a search pattern like “<+... f(...) ...+>” refers only to content from the same logical source line? https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/translation_phases#Phase_2 Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
