On Tue, 19 May 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Can the semantic patch language help to insist for a search that a bit
> >> of source code belongs to the implementation of a function-like macro?
> >
> > That's what the search that was written does. The pattern that comes
> > after #define has to be in the definition of the macro.
>
> I suggest to consider additional source code variants.
> With which SmPL constructs should be ensured that a search pattern
> like “<+... f(...) ...+>” refers only to content from the same logical source
> line?
> https://en.cppreference.com/w/c/language/translation_phases#Phase_2
Please stop asking the same question over and over. In the context of a
macro definition, <+... f(...) ...+> will only match what is from the same
logical source line. Because that is all that there is in a macro
definition. If Coccinelle is working on a macro definition, it works only
on that macro definition. If it is working on a function definition, it
works only on that function definition.
julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
[email protected]
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
