>> I assumed that I may omit the semicolon in such a SmPL code. >> Can the specification of a SmPL nest construct ever be sufficient here? > > No. <+... ...+> matches a subtree of an AST. For a variable > initialization, there is no subtree of the AST that includes both the > right side of an = and the ;.
Can the abstract syntax tree be adjusted accordingly? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
