>>>> I assumed that I may omit the semicolon in such a SmPL code. >>>> Can the specification of a SmPL nest construct ever be sufficient here? >>> >>> No. <+... ...+> matches a subtree of an AST. For a variable >>> initialization, there is no subtree of the AST that includes both the >>> right side of an = and the ;. >> >> Can the abstract syntax tree be adjusted accordingly? > > No.
Can such a rejection mean that software development efforts look undesirable (while adjustments for the data model would eventually be possible)? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list [email protected] https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
