On Sat, 5 Jun 2021, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Thanks! That seems to be it indeed. Interestingly, including the
> actual path to the real headers with -I didn't fix the issue.
Most of the time, Coccinelle doesn't use macro definitions. The -I could
have been useful for figuring out some types, but probably wasn't needed
in this case.
> I tried
> adding other options passed as -D to the compiler in a macro file, in
> case that was influencing the parsing, to no avail. So in the end I
> indeed went with just defining those to int. Seems to work well! Last
> minor cosmetic issue is that it turns `struct a
> [space][space][space][space][space][space][space] x` into `struct b
> [space] x`, which is easy enough to fix up by hand.
That's beyond the degree of cleverness we try t oprovide. but in this
particular case, it would probably not have been needed if the rule for
changing the type name had only changed the name, and not the whole member
declaration.
julia
> (The BSDs do weird
> and terrible things with whitespace sometimes.)
>
> Jason
>
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
