> On Aug 5, 2015, at 9:48 PM, Rick Mann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On Aug 5, 2015, at 17:40 , Charles Srstka <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Aug 5, 2015, at 7:21 PM, Rick Mann <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Would it make sense for Swift to just let you add method implementations to >>> protocols (perhaps as a shortcut to the protocol-extension technique you >>> used)? >> >> That’s what a protocol extension *is*. > > No, I meant syntactically to the protocol. I'm not saying get rid of protocol > extensions, but why not be able to also do this? > > protocol MyProtocol { > func myFunc() > { > some stuff > } > } > > This should be equivalent to > > protocol MyProtocol { > } > > extension MyProtocol { > func myFunc() > { > some stuff > } > }
Ah, sorry I misunderstood. Yeah, this does seem to be a bit of a no-brainer. Charles _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
