On 10 Aug 2017, at 14:57, gerti-cocoa...@bitart.com wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2017, at 02:18, Alastair Houghton <alast...@alastairs-place.net> 
> wrote:
>> Personally I *would* still discourage +new in favour of class-specific 
>> convenience constructors because I think it’s less expressive and also less 
>> consistent (e.g. +array is better, in my opinion, than +new, not least 
>> because +arrayWithObjects: and others exist).
> [NSArray new] := [[NSArray alloc]init]
> [NSArray array] := [[[NSArray alloc]init]autorelease]
> +array and friends came along with the introduction of autorelease pools, to 
> replace +new with something that didn't imply ownership (the oft mentioned 
> special meaning of "new" as prefix). So while with ARC they are essentially 
> equivalent, previously they were not.

Yes, I know that, thanks.

The point is, with ARC, they’re equivalent, and most new code uses ARC, so, 
again, I’d discourage +new in favour of class-specific convenience constructors.

Kind regards,




Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to