On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:12 AM, mmalc crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jul 2, 2008, at 4:04 PM, Hamish Allan wrote: > >> This is a rather unuseful attitude to take. Clearly, this thread >> started as a result of the distinction. Also, Apple's own >> documentation disagrees with you, as it states that Cocoa bindings are >> built on KVB. >> > No, it doesn't.
No, really, it does! Read Ken's post again: he links to docs that talk of Cocoa bindings "relying on" KVB, and KVB being one of the main technologies "underpinning" Cocoa bindings. You yourself make pretty much the same distinction: > "Cocoa bindings" is an abstract term that refers to a collection of > technologies that used together keep views, controllers, and models > synchronised. > Key-value binding is one of those technologies. > There are not "two different kinds of binding". If that is the case, let me ask: is KVB unidirectional or bi-directional? Hamish _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
