That looks very interesting, thank you, I will take a look. As you say, it's the package format that matters.
You don't seem to be charging a fee. Any licensing issues? Maybe an acknowledgement in the About box. And do the packages it builds install on Tiger? Thanks. Paul Sanders. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jean-Daniel Dupas" <[email protected]> To: "Sean McBride" <[email protected]> Cc: "Cocoa Developers" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 6:22 PM Subject: Re: Guidance on use of Application Support folder Switching away from Package Maker is fine as long as you maintain the .pkg/.mpkg format. OS X have a couple of nice way to deploy .pkg on many machines (command line tools like installer, Remote Desktop integration, etc.) that are not possible with custom installer. And you are not the only one that want something better than PackageMaker to build package: http://s.sudre.free.fr/Software/Packages.html _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
