On 2010 Sep 03, at 21:25, Gideon King wrote:

> I was able to track it down by going to the 
> maintainInverseRelationship:forProperty:oldDestination:newDestination: method 
> call in the stack, and finding the entity in register 12.

So did you ever find out the mapping between function parameters and registers 
on the 64-bit Intel architecture, or did you just poke around blindly in all 
the registers?

Can anyone confirm that the  *(int *)($esp+4), *(int *)($esp+8) incantations 
given in Apple's TN2124 are only true on the 32-bit Intel architecture?

_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected])

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to [email protected]

Reply via email to