On Sep 4, 2010, at 12:50 PM, Jerry Krinock wrote: > > On 2010 Sep 03, at 21:25, Gideon King wrote: > >> I was able to track it down by going to the >> maintainInverseRelationship:forProperty:oldDestination:newDestination: >> method call in the stack, and finding the entity in register 12. > > So did you ever find out the mapping between function parameters and > registers on the 64-bit Intel architecture, or did you just poke around > blindly in all the registers? > > Can anyone confirm that the *(int *)($esp+4), *(int *)($esp+8) incantations > given in Apple's TN2124 are only true on the 32-bit Intel architecture? >
By definition. The stack pointer is only called esp on i386. On 64 bit architectures the register is rsp. > _______________________________________________ > > Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > > Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. > Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/velocityboy%40rodentia.net > > This email sent to [email protected] > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
