I agree that this is more appropriate on the Xcode list, but the overwhelming amount of agreement, and the fact that longtime users who know that this is a better fit for the Xcode list, continue to have the discussion anyway, communicates something.
I find the actual interface to be a mixed bag; comments on both sides have been a bit hyperbolic at times. What's more of an issue are known bugs that keep things from building and/or running successfully. I feel that this is a large change to have not hammered at that stuff a bit more as far as the actual underpinning not being buggy (again, I'm not getting into the GUI debate), but then again, who hasn't had a deadline. It's too bad that the iCloud, Appstore, and various Lion features seem contingent upon Xcode 4+ builds, because it may have resulted in more time and a more stable development environment. It's noteworthy that many of the people frothing on about how wonderful the Xcode changes are, are either fairly new to Mac development, seemingly don't have commercial or professional output, or work at Apple (a bit of over-generalization here for sure). -gt > That was brought up several times before and totally ignored. > Dave > On Jul 25, 2011, at 11:30 AM, JongAm Park wrote: > > Oh... BTW who started this thread in cocoa-dev mailing list? > > It should be go to xcode-users! -- George Toledo [email protected] www.georgetoledo.com _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list ([email protected]) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to [email protected]
