I had the same feeling at first, it seems that the 4.0 and then 4.1 updates were rush jobs….
-Laurent. -- Laurent Daudelin AIM/iChat/Skype:LaurentDaudelin http://www.nemesys-soft.com/ Logiciels Nemesys Software laur...@nemesys-soft.com On Jul 25, 2011, at 12:45, George Toledo wrote: > I agree that this is more appropriate on the Xcode list, but the > overwhelming amount of agreement, and the fact that longtime users who know > that this is a better fit for the Xcode list, continue to have the > discussion anyway, communicates something. > > I find the actual interface to be a mixed bag; comments on both sides have > been a bit hyperbolic at times. > > What's more of an issue are known bugs that keep things from building and/or > running successfully. I feel that this is a large change to have not > hammered at that stuff a bit more as far as the actual underpinning not > being buggy (again, I'm not getting into the GUI debate), but then again, > who hasn't had a deadline. It's too bad that the iCloud, Appstore, and > various Lion features seem contingent upon Xcode 4+ builds, because it may > have resulted in more time and a more stable development environment. > > It's noteworthy that many of the people frothing on about how wonderful the > Xcode changes are, are either fairly new to Mac development, seemingly don't > have commercial or professional output, or work at Apple (a bit of > over-generalization here for sure). _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
