Chris
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
on 6/20/03 11:52 AM Reinhard Pötz wrote:
Yes, you are right. The current draft of the FOM does not contain a database layer.
I see two options:
1.) remove it complety 2.) add it to the petstore examples (which are based on those JS functions)
I'm in favour of removing them complety and encapsulate the database
calls in the petstore examples using Java objects. So we can show our
users what we envision as the best way of writing flow apps with
database access.
In theory, if the new FOM is complete, you can have access to the database connection avalon component directly from getComponent() and the petstore can be changed accordingly. This would:
1) remove the need for database.js 2) keep concerns separate 3) avoid the need for a javascript extension concept that we planned but never came to even design.
What do you think?
