> From: Stefano Mazzocchi > > > on 6/20/03 11:52 AM Reinhard Pötz wrote: > > > Yes, you are right. The current draft of the FOM does not contain a > > database layer. > > > > I see two options: > > > > 1.) remove it complety > > 2.) add it to the petstore examples (which are based on those JS > > functions) > > > > I'm in favour of removing them complety and encapsulate the > database > > calls in the petstore examples using Java objects. So we > can show our > > users what we envision as the best way of writing flow apps with > > database access. > > In theory, if the new FOM is complete, you can have access to > the database connection avalon component directly from > getComponent() and the petstore can be changed accordingly. > This would: > > 1) remove the need for database.js > 2) keep concerns separate > 3) avoid the need for a javascript extension concept that we > planned but never came to even design. > > What do you think?
a late +1 (Christian has already moved it into the scratchpad examples) Reinhard
