--- Colin Britton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > - can we make Batik act nicer? It's throwing alot
> of Exceptions which
> > might be because it was not designed to run in a
> server/servlet
> > environment or we use it the wrong way? Is
> anyone on the batik list
> > or more familiar with it? Batik starts with a
> TranscoderException
> > encloseing a null Exception and one that states
> "Connection reset
> > by peer". Any suggestions?
>
> Our SVGSerializer works by building a DOM document
> object and passing this
> to Batik. This was because when the first Batik
> Transcoder was made
> available that was the only way you could do it.
> Since that first release
> that the SVGSerializer was based on was produced the
> transcoder interface
> was rewritten. In that new interface came support
> for a
> org.xml.sax.XMLReader and I believe full SAX2
> support. It would probably a
> good idea to change to this interface rather than
> the current
> implementation.
>
> People wiser than me in these matters may have a
> different opinion, but I
> would hate for us to be using the wrong way of
> interfacing with batik
> because we did'nt know better.
I agree completely. So it can handle SAX huh?
I wonder how much quicker it would make image then...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices
http://auctions.yahoo.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
