On Sat, 2 Jun 2001, Donald Ball wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, giacomo wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for everything. But how about docs? Till when should we work on it? Sunday
>(MEST)?
> >
> > I'd propose to work on the docs from *NOW* on until Beta 2 (let's say
> > for about a month or so).
> >
> > I still havn't heard much about the branching proposal from the rest of
> > the commiters. IIRC only Donald and Carsten have given their oppinions
> > and they are oppositional.
>
> as long as we agree to _do_ bug fixes on 2.0 and not just leave it hanging
> once 2.1 work gets underway, i'm fine with the branch.
I want to make this clear once again. I don't intend to push a 2.1
branch. I'd only want to have a container to put things into on which
we'll decide that it will not make it into the 2.0 release. To undeline
this we can make the HEAD branch be 2.0 and the side branch the 2.1. I
have no problems with it. I've only thought that it would be more
naturally to have the HEAD be 2.1 and the side branch 2.0.
Giacomo
>
> - donald
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
