On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 06:10:01PM +0200, giacomo wrote:
> I want to make this clear once again. I don't intend to push a 2.1
> branch. I'd only want to have a container to put things into on which
> we'll decide that it will not make it into the 2.0 release. To undeline
> this we can make the HEAD branch be 2.0 and the side branch the 2.1. I
> have no problems with it. I've only thought that it would be more
> naturally to have the HEAD be 2.1 and the side branch 2.0.
I'm +1 for 2.1 being HEAD and 2.0 being side branch, it's similar approach
that Xfree is using as I remember and it's also the approach cvs itself is
promoting..., I'm also +1 for forking the 2.0 immediately when going beta
>
> Giacomo
>
martin
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Only dead fish swims with a stream"
gpg_key_available: http://globales.cz/~mman/martin.man.gpg
gpg_key_fingerprint: 2CC0 4AF6 92DA 5CBF 5F09 7BCB 6202 7024 6E06 0223
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
