> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: MORÁVEK Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Juni 2001 14:57
> An: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Betreff: RE: [C2]: Beta 1 - It's there....
>
>
> Be aware ... there are 2 links to dist sections:
>
> 1. from the xml.apache.org root - http://xml.apache.org/dist/cocoon/ -
> contains C2 build
> 2. from the cocoon root - http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/dist/ - doesn't
> contain any C2 build
>
Yes, these are two different directories. I assume (but really don't now)
that we should change the second one to point to dist/cocoon instead
of cocoon/dist.
Carsten
Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated
================================================================
Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
www.sundn.de mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
================================================================
> Please correct it.
>
> Thanks
>
> Peter
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 2:25 PM
> > To: Cocoon-Dev@Xml. Apache. Org
> > Subject: AW: [C2]: Beta 1 - It's there....
> >
> >
> > > Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > >
> > > Carsten,
> > >
> > > Good Job!!!...Can you please clarify a few things?
> > >
> > > 1. http://xml.apache.org/dist/cocoon does not seem to have any c2
> > > stuff? which URL should it be?
> >
> > It is there! The files are "Cocoon-2.0b1.zip" and
> > "Cocoon-2.0b1.tar.gz"
> > inside that directory. The signature files have the same name
> > with ".sig"
> > appended.
> >
> > > 2. What is the process (cvs commands) for getting the 2.0
> > > Tag/Branch for fixing problems?
> > >
> > It's a "cvs co -r cocoon_20_branch xml-cocoon2". My advice is to have
> > to versions of c2 checked out, the HEAD (e.g 2.1-dev) and the
> > 2.0 branch.
> > A simple (usual) checkin works then in both directories for the
> > given version. So after you checked out with the above command,
> > you could simply change whatever you want and simply do "cvs ci
> > xml-cocoon2".
> >
> >
> > Carsten
> >
> > Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated
> > ================================================================
> > Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
> > www.sundn.de mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > ================================================================
> >
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > dims
> > >
> > > --- Carsten Ziegeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi Cocooners!
> > > >
> > > > Finally we did it! I just put the distribution of the beta 1
> > > > into /www/xml.apache.org/dist/cocoon.
> > > >
> > > > The distribution is signed with my public key which is included
> > > > in the KEYS file of the distribution. I also published the key
> > > > to ldap://keyserver.pgp.com.
> > > >
> > > > Could someone verify that the distribution files are alright
> > > > and properly signed?
> > > >
> > > > So, congratulations to the C2 developer team and all "submitters,
> > > > testers, patchers, critics etc"!
> > > >
> > > > Lets keep on this great work and spread the news!
> > > >
> > > > Now the CVS stuff:
> > > > - I tagged the beta with cocoon_20_b1
> > > > - I checked in the build.xml with the new version 2.1-dev
> > > > - I made a branch of cocoon_20_b1 with the name cocoon_20
> > > > - I checked in the build.xml with the new version 2.0b1-dev under
> > > > the branch cocoon_20_branch.
> > > > So the HEAD is the 2.1 version and the 2.0 is a branch.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > PS: And here follows the fun part for all of you interested in
> > > > building a distribution....
> > > >
> > > > Now, some problems I had with building the distribution:
> > > > 1. I had no public pgp key suitable for signing the dist....
> > > > So I had to create a new one.
> > > > 2. Operations on daedalus are slow
> > > > I used my own machine instead and had to transfer the
> > > > files (Beforehand I had to install the jdk 1.2.2)
> > > > 3. The build docs is not working on daedalus. The build
> > > > ends with an exception telling that a lib (I think it
> > > > was libXm.so) is missing.
> > > > Perhaps someone could check this?
> > > >
> > > > So at the end no real problems at all....(until now at least)
> > > > What's next?
> > > >
> > > > Carsten
> > > >
> > > > Open Source Group sunShine - b:Integrated
> > > > ================================================================
> > > > Carsten Ziegeler, S&N AG, Klingenderstrasse 5, D-33100 Paderborn
> > > > www.sundn.de mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > ================================================================
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > =====
> > > Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
> > > http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
> > >
> > > __________________________________________________
> > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
> > > a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
