On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Ovidiu Predescu wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:52:14 +0200, "Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Cocooners!
> >
> > Finally we did it! I just put the distribution of the beta 1
> > into /www/xml.apache.org/dist/cocoon.
>
> Congratulations! It's great to finally see it out the door!
>
> > The distribution is signed with my public key which is included
> > in the KEYS file of the distribution. I also published the key
> > to ldap://keyserver.pgp.com.
> >
> > Could someone verify that the distribution files are alright
> > and properly signed?
>
> I tried to verify the distribution files using gpg, but I get this
> error message:
>
> gpg: Signature made Wed 06 Jun 2001 09:11:09 AM PDT using DSA key ID F6E0A8F8
> gpg: requesting key F6E0A8F8 from keyserver.pgp.com ...
> gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found.
> gpg: Total number processed: 0
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
> Did you use gpg to sign the package?
>
> > So, congratulations to the C2 developer team and all "submitters,
> > testers, patchers, critics etc"!
> >
> > Lets keep on this great work and spread the news!
> >
> > Now the CVS stuff:
> > - I tagged the beta with cocoon_20_b1
> > - I checked in the build.xml with the new version 2.1-dev
> > - I made a branch of cocoon_20_b1 with the name cocoon_20
> > - I checked in the build.xml with the new version 2.0b1-dev under
> > the branch cocoon_20_branch.
> > So the HEAD is the 2.1 version and the 2.0 is a branch.
>
> Yes, that good. I assume all the new development will happen only on
> the HEAD and bug fixes will be applied to both HEAD and 2.0b1-dev
> branch. Is this the common understanding?
It depends :) Adding components can certainly be done on the
cocoon_20_branch (after voting for) but general API chnges surely not.
>
> > PS: And here follows the fun part for all of you interested in
> > building a distribution....
> >
> > Now, some problems I had with building the distribution:
> > 1. I had no public pgp key suitable for signing the dist....
> > So I had to create a new one.
> > 2. Operations on daedalus are slow
> > I used my own machine instead and had to transfer the
> > files (Beforehand I had to install the jdk 1.2.2)
> > 3. The build docs is not working on daedalus. The build
> > ends with an exception telling that a lib (I think it
> > was libXm.so) is missing.
> > Perhaps someone could check this?
>
> Perhaps somebody needs to install LessTif on daedalus so the image
> generation processing could work fine. I don't have access to the
> machine so I can't help.
Not sure if this will help? Do you have any experience with LessTif and
C2? I've use Xvfb on X-less server to fix it.
Giacomo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
