On Thu, 9 Aug 2001, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > There are two distinct problems here that I'd like to discuss > separately: XSP as actions and the Action interface. +0 on xsps as actions. sure, it might be nice to leverage existing logicsheets in xsp actions, but writing a standalone action class is quite easy anyway. +1 on making actions not necessarily implement threadsafe. - donald --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Jeremy Quinn
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Berin Loritsch
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Giacomo Pati
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Steele, Tony
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Sylvain Wallez
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? giacomo
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Jeremy Quinn
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Donald Ball
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Torsten Curdt
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? giacomo
- Re: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Berin Loritsch
- RE: Why does Action extend ThreadSafe ? Torsten Curdt